Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Ability and Willingness

The direction of readiness to be successful level for a student is a function of both ability and willingness.

Ability has three components: knowledge, experience, and skill. Similarly, willingness has three elements: confidence, commitment, and motivation. One convenient way to assess ability and willingness of a student is to use simple rating chart. Use a scale from +, +, +, +, +, + for the six different pieces (knowledge, experience, skill and confidence, commitment, motivation) reflecting a high level of readiness, to -, -, -, -, -, - for the six pieces reflecting a low level of readiness . . . and every combination in between.

I use a simple grid check sheet, with the student names on the left and boxes for each of the six components. Especially at the beginning of the school year. I will fill out a new sheet each day for the first few days of the school year. This provides a very quick and easy way to begin gathering data (albeit anecdotal data) about my students.

Determining the readiness level of your students is very important. For example, involvement and participation in decision making with people at extremely low levels of readiness might be characterized by a pooling of ignorance; therefore, directive leadership has a higher probability of success. The teacher's task is to help raise the readiness level of every student, so that they can effectively be involved in the decision making. In order for this to happen, the teacher must be purposeful and have a plan. A goal without a plan is a wish.

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Quality is Everyone's Responsibility


“Quality is everyone’s responsibility.”
W. Edwards Deming

The New York Times described W. Edwards Deming as an “expert of business management . . . that emphasized problem-solving based on cooperation.” Deming called for organizations to have a systematic approach to problem solving, encouraged teamwork and cooperation, stressed the need for education and leadership, and have an appreciation for a system. He described a system as “a network of interdependent components that work together to try to accomplish an aim . . . without an aim there is no system.”

Inspired by Deming’s work, I have developed a system for my 8th grade American History class. This system has an aim, which we refer to daily: “The Land of Choices” that will be reached through continual quality improvement. From the very first day of eighth grade, we talk about where they want to be four years down the road. The discussion is not so much on what they will specifically do after high school, but rather what choices will be open to them. I want all of my students to develop the intellectual confidence necessary to complete a rigorous high school curriculum. We work to develop the knowledge, skills, abilities, and confidence to take challenging courses. This, in turn, will open up many opportunities for them. They will have successfully reached “The Land of Choices.”

We begin each unit with a capacity matrix. A charting technique used to break down topic areas into steps for achieving a specific result, a capacity matrix identifies tasks, knowledge levels, and understanding of the topic area. Students know from the beginning, what specific information they will need for the unit assessment and use the matrix to chart their personal growth toward the understanding of that information. 

The system of our class, which is graphically displayed for students in a detailed flow chart, is made up of three main pieces. We regularly have “Big Shows,” which are used as direct instruction for the entire class. Here, key concepts and connections are explained and examined. Additionally, students use the “Big Shows” to practice listening, note-taking, and summarizing skills. These “Big Shows” are put on my Youtube channel for students to view and review as needed.

There is also an online component to our class system. Using moodle as our platform, students go to my online page to take practice tests, access and share information, download assignments, watch videos, access podcasts, and post to forums. Students have visited my page as early as 4:00 AM and as late as 1:00 AM – and everything in between. We have thousands of page views each and every month.

The third component of our class is the heart of the system. I employ Situational Leadership to differentiate the daily work done by students. Situational Leadership focuses on the specific readiness level to be successful for the student in a given task or unit of study. I adapt the daily work given to the student to best fit his or her readiness level. Using the capacity matrix as the roadmap, students may take differing paths, but they all end up at the same destination. This differentiation allows me to challenge students at a level most appropriate for them, thereby maximizing their growth potential.

The focus of our system is not about hurriedly covering the material. We seek continual quality improvement . . . for all students. We strive to not only improve the class average but also shrink the gap between the most successful and least successful students. Quality work and quality learning is the goal for all students. Quality is everyone’s responsibility.

Monday, September 9, 2013

Direction of Readiness Change

Situational Leadership contends that strong direction with students with low readiness is appropriate if they are to become productive. People with high readiness do not need socio-emotional support as much as they need greater freedom. Whenever a student's performance begins to slip - for whatever reason - the teacher should reassess the readiness level and move backward through the leadership curve.

It is useful to measure not only the student's general level of readiness to be successful, but also the direction of this readiness. The direction is a function of ability and willingness.

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Appropriate Leader Behavior for Readiness Level 4

Finally we come to your students who display the highest readiness level for the task at hand. These are the students who are both able and willing or confident to be successful. With these R4 students teachers should:

  • Listen to updates
  • Resist overloading
  • Encourage autonomy
  • Practice overall hands-off management; observe
  • Reinforce student-led communication
  • Provide support and resources
  • Delegate activities
  • Encourage freedom for risk taking

Regarding teacher behavior toward students, Situational Leadership contends that one size does not fit all . . . in fact, one size doesn't even fit most. If your goal to have every individual show continual quality improvement, you must choose a set of leader behaviors that is most appropriate for that student. Differentiation is the key.

Situational Leadership provides one way . . . a way that has shown to be repeatedly successful, to help reach the goal of continual quality improvement for all students. It provides a framework . . . a plan to help accomplish this. 

A goal without a plan is nothing more than a wish.

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Appropriate Leader Behavior for Readiness Level 3

Building on our discussion about the appropriate leader/teacher behavior for individual student readiness levels, today we are focusing on the students who display a higher readiness level (R3) but still need more input from the teacher.

Appropriate teacher behavior for students who are able but unwilling (R3):

  • Share decision making with the student.
  • Feed the student's "need to know."
  • Focus on the results.
  • Involve the student in the consequences of the task to increase commitment and motivation.

Appropriate teacher behavior for students who are able but insecure (R3):

  • Combine teacher-student decision making.
  • Teacher determines the next step.
  • Encourage and support the student.
  • Discuss apprehension with the student.